Danger Word and Twenty-Three Snapshots of San Francisco have very unique ways of representing the ‘zombie’
catastrophe and the effect it has. In Twenty-Three Snapshots we are given an almost surreal narrative of the events tied to
each of the narrator’s pictures. Some of the pictures are of his friend
Bradley’s constricted face before he’s killed and the man who developed his
photos (his memories). These photos are the collective memories of certain
events of his life and he looks back at them almost nonchalantly. We as the
readers hear his story as a horrifying event, an event that should get a stronger
response from him. His acceptance is scary.
In Danger Word Grandpa Joe, Kendrick, and other humans are face
with a different kind of zombie. These zombies are hard to distinguish from
ourselves. They are not brain dead, decaying and immediately recognizable (not
right away). They can retain human motor controls for a while, have our
memories, and recognize others. They can even talk some. All of these
features were shocking because it makes them deadly predators. It’s also scary
because it is hard to pinpoint the line between human and zombie.
Each of these stories
has a small critique of social constructs. In Twenty-Three Snapshots we see how social rules change during disasters and how killing
becomes normal. This is something we like to deny has a possibility of
happening. In Danger Word we question what it means to be human. We
believe our intelligence and way of life is our 'humanity' but zombies do not
choose to be zombies. Once they are zombies they do retain memories and eat
their choice of food, humans. They do not kill each other like we do. We,
therefore, can go so far as to ask, which is more human?
No comments:
Post a Comment